View Single Post
Old 07-31-2017, 10:33 PM   #13
Dorianmode
always learning
 
Dorianmode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minneapolis / Rancho Santa Fe
Posts: 277
The race had too many unknowns for me to play it. I came up with 8-5-9, (and for reasons I won't try to explain, it was *bet on all three, to win or pass*). It looks like the odds may have been OK for that, had I played it. When I've developed the numbers enough to say something intelligent on them, I'll try to present it, but, the race numbers in my (trial) *Wager Quality* concept were rather poor, (in that they didn't show a very large advantage in my first two choices, over the next best 3 runners. I probably would have passed just for that reason, but as I said, I wouldn't have even looked at the race as a wagering opportunity, anyway. Great job done by Pook, Mitch and Tim.
Dorianmode is offline   Reply With Quote