|
Bill that 406 only represents slightly a fraction more that 20% which tells me there were many good paying horses in there. I myself would rather have a primary factor much higher. At those percentages it should be regulated to a secondary factor for possible ex. and a longshot factor. For winners it destroys the other readouts for the line or score.
In Brohamer's book their objective was to use factors with a high percent in the top 2 for winners. Anytime a low producing factor is added to a group it tears the group down significantly.DD ,Ex. etc. all spring from winners.
Mitch44
|