Tdn 6-10
 

TRK FAST
06-10-2020, 12:34 PMAdd to this user's reputation
R1 7653
r2 2671
r3 1e26 ls4
r4 6753 ls1
r5 52e13
r6 3125
r7 1273
r8 7543 ls2
good luck
TIM

Best of luck Tim.


Mitch44

Thanks Mitch same to you.
Tim

Todays' recap. 8 races capped
5 #1s 13.00,3.40,7.40,5.00,4.60
1 #2 6.40
1 #3 4.60
1 #4 11.20
Exotics in top 4
both dds 44.80.18.00
2 exs 11.20,62.40
1 $1 tri 91.50
1 super 13.93
6 p3s 12.50,37.70,19.30,126.60,77.20,81.40
2 p4s 84.35,183.35
1 p5 596.35
1 p6 22328
Another good day at a small track.
Tim

Very nice
 

Way to go LT1,

I had a nice day at GP.
The p-6 was unplayable because the first leg was scratched down to 7 FTS.
So I decided to play a small p-5.
I used two singles with two horses in the next two legs and three horses in the last leg for a total of 6.00 bet.

The pic 5 paid 364.55.
This was the only bet I made today.
Rmath

Thanks Rich and congrats to you on yet another good hit with a small investment. Note that the p5 at TDN today was almost double the p6. We have talked about this having seen this before even at the big tracks. May have something to do we folks seeking life changing scores.
Tim

Hello Tim
Long time no talk!
I do not understand your result posts?

When you lost pic threes,pick 4 or even pic 6/
Does this show WHAT YOU WON OR THE ACTUAL PAYOFFS?

I need to call you soon on viewing pace lines and readings

Hope you and all yours are keeping safe!

Thanks as always!
Papa John

My mistake for not profit reading

I meant lost not lost

Sorry!

Hi John. The results show how the top 4 picks fared for the day and the prices each bet paid if played.. I attempt to show that using RDSS and following the Docs' guidelines, and following a consistent approach folks can consistently show a profit.
Yes there will be some losing days but as long as you remain consistent in your approach you will win.
Tim

Really nice work Tim, glad to hear you snagged that nice EX & DD for a nice day. Congrats!!


Most would change up somehow after a bad day such as changing pace lines or contenders. A consistent approach will always outperform a hap-hazard approach.
Great work,


Mitch44