MNR bl/bl
 

bl/bl
bill how do you that with "thumbnail" and more then 1 screenshot??
john

Multi Screens
 

Hi Rverge

I used a trial version of Techsmiths
Snagit to make the screen shots

http://www.techsmith.com/

I saved the screen shots to a file Then I pasted them onto a word document

This is cool if you want to add text to your screen shots

I pasted all the shots together, Then made a new capture with
Snagit The cool thing is they have a option to capture whole web pages
So that is why It scrolls down to screens that you can't see

The Thumbnails was a option that I figured would look nicer
I liked the clean look and the fact that I could add many captures to each post with this option

Trouble is some members could not see the thumbnails
so I ditched that look

Thanks Bill

Hi Ritchie,

This race was hard to come up with a single pick.
I would have to go with a (7, 9) pick to win for this race.
These 2 come up for me in almost a virtual tie and could very well be the exacta.:D

WHY am I doing this ??????
 

Thanx Rverge and Parts!

Here is WHY I started these posts asking for advice from cappers HERE:

there are all kinds of sophisticated "intelligence" or "AI" programs on the market ok? Some claim these things have all these "artificial cappers" handicapping races and then they form kind of a consenses among themselves which results in a PROBABILITY being displayed for each horse.

OK I have seen some of these and in MY mind there is no ****ing way these "artificial cappers" can out do the folks here who are all using some sort of software ok? NO ****ing way man.

So I am trying to find tough races with full fields, no PRE RACE giant on paper and a group of corrolaries compiled by TWO seperate sharp cappers who gathered data INDEPENDENT of one another. Figuring if I can turn us loose here and give everyone the freedom to do their OWN thing we can possibly do something real real cool and potentially profitable down the road a bit.

The one thing I AM questioning is listing corrolaries as this might ultimately backfire and PREVENT users from doing their thing FULLY cause they are restricted by these "Factors". This might be self defeating and possibly we should just throw the race out there to EVERYONE regardless of software/corrolaries and see what input comes then. Just like "Partsnuts" input before. WHAT DO YOU THINK??

Hey I am human and screw up. I also have a very active imagination and I swear I know we can pound these "AI" things into submission with our own
"HUMAN INTELLIGENCE" and feedback from a very sharp group here.

THAT is why I started this ok?

I REALLY appreciate ALL the feedback especially from those who took the chance to make feedback here their FIRST post. I think this is all good folks!

let's see what shakes out a bit later!

Richie

Might not get an accurate read track is listed as muddy.

odds
 

10 to post

Here You Go !
 

check OUR intelligence as a GROUP. LOOK at the matrix

ok we HAVE to bet the # 10

now our 2nd choice is a tie tween the 4 and 9 4 is 4/1 9 is 9/1 ummmm

follow? I am tellin you I know this **** will work man I am dead serious

we can have our own "human intelligence" for a few races a week

MY opinion

winner # 9 at 9/1
place # 5
show # 7

luv
Richie

mnr
 

boy i passed the 9 becauce of the high Med%. but was it the 2 time L for a fillie after it bled?
john

I went to the (7,9) because they were the 2 only horses that fit in this 5.5 F
race. I don't normally go with 2 horses to win but this was one of those occasions where I couldn't split them.
The factors on my model brought these 2 horses to the top with a difference of .02 of a point differential.
My model also showed me that the overiding factor was "winners of this type race at 5.5F". Horses at 6.0F fell short.

Richie,

Thanks for posting the race. I would not have worked it if not for you. $20 beans was a nice payoff on Diamond Heirloom.

Jim